SESE Training โ€“ Matthew Fabian

Handling RFPs

Bid/no-bid, compliance matrices, answering clearly, clarifications and avoiding disqualification.

โฑ ~20 minModule 5 of 5Quiz โ†“Common mistakes โ†“
๐ŸŽฏ Learning objectives
  • Decide whether to bid
  • Build a compliance matrix
  • Write clear, honest responses
  • Avoid common disqualification traps

Bid / no-bid

Not every RFP is winnable. Ask: Did we know about this before it was published? Do we have a relationship with the evaluators? Does the specification favour a competitor? Can we meet the mandatory requirements? Is the scope and margin worth the effort? A fast, reasoned "no-bid" frees time for deals you can win.

Compliance matrix

Spec sectionRequirementResponseComply / Partial / ExceptionNotes / reference
2.3.1Cameras shall support H.265Supported on all proposed modelsComplyDatasheets, App. B
2.4.7Pixel density for identification at entrancesDesigned for โ‰ฅ250 px/m (IEC 62676-4:2014) at each entranceComplyCalculations, App. C
3.1.2Readers shall use OSDP with Secure ChannelAll readers OSDP v2 with Secure ChannelComply
4.2.590-day retention for all camerasProposed 30 days for general, 90 days for critical; alternative pricedExceptionClarification requested

Answer every requirement, in order, using their numbering. Never leave a line blank.

Writing responses

  • Lead with the answer (Comply / Partial / Exception), then explain briefly.
  • Be specific and verifiable: model numbers, standards, document references.
  • Be honest about partial compliance and offer alternatives; evaluators notice vague answers.
  • Reuse a maintained answer library, but tailor every response to this customer.
  • Watch for spec language that requires a specific product "or equal" and document equivalence carefully.

Process

  1. Read everythingIncluding terms, insurance, bonding, submission format and deadlines.
  2. Kick-offAssign owners for technical, pricing, legal and formatting.
  3. QuestionsSubmit clarifications before the question deadline; ambiguity favours whoever wrote the spec.
  4. Pre-bid meeting / site walkAttend; mandatory ones disqualify if missed.
  5. Draft, review, submitPeer review for compliance and consistency; submit early; confirm receipt.

Common mistakes

  • Missing a mandatory pre-bid meeting or format requirement.
  • Claiming full compliance where you are partial.
  • Answering out of order or with marketing copy.
  • Not asking clarification questions.
  • Bidding on everything.

Check your understanding

1.Name three questions for a bid/no-bid decision.

Did we know about it before publication? Do we have a relationship with evaluators? Can we meet mandatory requirements? Does the spec favour a competitor? Is it worth the effort and margin?

2.A spec asks for something you can only partially meet. Best response?

Be honest and specific; offer alternatives and request clarification if needed.
Progress is saved in this browser only.